[maggot]

I was thinking about a different session in our site beyond the prominent members: The TSC hall of fame. It could have a voting to select some pros and/or important members. After that, the admins would create a small bio explaning why that member is important and what he did in the games and in the site itself, with a photo of them. It's something like The Elite hall of fame. http://the-elite.net/thehall

[Bilan]

You know, thats a pretty neat idea.

[maggot]

Thanks.

[yse]

The funny thing is, after the awards I was thinking about this very idea... it probably needs a bit of thinking through how to nominate players for it and such.

[maggot]

You guys could make a voting like the one in the awards, or the admins could come with the players after an internal discussion.

[magnum12]

Here's some criteria to think of.
1. People who have had championships in three or more different games (need not be at the same time) should definately be considered.
2. People who have had more than one championship at the same time (2 or 3 seems most appropiate as a minimum) should definately be considered.
3. Players who have had major impacts on competition early in their career (claiming lots of records early on, dethroning long lasting records, or even better, dethroning some of the longest reigns as champion in the site's history at the time) should be considered.

[maggot]

Good idea magnum. Also people who worked to make the site better (with videos and guides) should be considered.

[Rolken]

Or just replace the prominent members section.

[magnum12]

Good idea Rolken. We could always rename the prominent members section the TSC Hall of Fame after we nominate more members.

[PsyBorg]

Here's some criteria to think of.
1. People who have had championships in three or more different games (need not be at the same time) should definately be considered.
2. People who have had more than one championship at the same time (2 or 3 seems most appropiate as a minimum) should definately be considered.

my my, i qualify. >.>


Also yeah, I agree that prominent members should be replaced by this...

[magnum12]

Here's some criteria to think of.
1. People who have had championships in three or more different games (need not be at the same time) should definately be considered.
2. People who have had more than one championship at the same time (2 or 3 seems most appropiate as a minimum) should definately be considered.

my my, i qualify. >.>


Also yeah, I agree that prominent members should be replaced by this...

Come to think of it, I just now realized that I might qualify as well based on those criteria.
1. Held championships in SH, SB, and ShtH at some point (along with decent overall rank in most 3D games).
2. See above, but have had all three at once briefly.

[maggot]

You guys could make an official topic to discuss who should be on the hall of fame.

[maggot]

Well..... any new plans for the hall of fame?

[magnum12]

No, asides from those criteria I mentioned and maybe we should discuss this in competition central.